Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurns, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorKriz, Katrin
dc.contributor.authorKrutzinna, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorLuhamaa, Katre
dc.contributor.authorMeysen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorPösö, Tarja
dc.contributor.authorSegado, Sagrario
dc.contributor.authorSkivenes, Marit
dc.contributor.authorThoburn, June
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T08:31:56Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T08:31:56Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-02
dc.identifier.citationBurns K, Kriz K, Krutzinna J, Luhamaa K, Meysen T, Pösö T, Segado, Skivenes M, Thoburn J. The Hidden Proceedings – An Analysis of Accountability of Child Protection Adoption Proceedings in Eight European Jurisdictions. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 2019;6(4):339-371eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/22251
dc.description.abstractHow accountable are decisions about terminating parental rights to ensure an adoption from care? In this paper we examine if the proceedings in eight European jurisdictions are accountable to: a) the private parties, i.e. individuals that are concerned – such as parents, child; b) the general public that authorized the politicians and the government to make legislation; and c) the elected government, i.e. the legislators and the system that have granted the court, court-like or administrative body the authority to make these decisions. Our data material consists of national legislation, organizational guidelines (courts, child protection, or supervisory agencies), statistics and expert knowledge. The conclusions of our analysis are discouraging. There is only limited accountability for one of the most intrusive interventions by a state into the private lives of individuals. There is a lack of information about the proceedings as well as a lack of transparency. We identify systems that, with few exceptions, operate in isolation, with only a few outsiders having access or knowledge about what is going on. We cannot in this study say anything about the decision-making quality in these proceedings, they may be excellent, but the problem is that very few external actors are in a position to examine the quality of the decisions. This missing connection between the wider democratic society and this part of the legal systems in the eight democracies we studied is of huge concern, and we have indications that the situation is equally concerning in other European states.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBrilleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectaccountabilityeng
dc.subjectadoption proceedingseng
dc.subjectcourt jurisdictionseng
dc.subjectcross-country comparisoneng
dc.titleThe Hidden Proceedings – An Analysis of Accountability of Child Protection Adoption Proceedings in Eight European Jurisdictionseng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.date.updated2019-12-12T09:13:05Z
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)eng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.identifier.cristinID1755507
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/22134514-00604002eng
dc.source.issn2213-4506eng
dc.source.issn2213-4514eng
dc.relation.projectIDEC/H2020: 724460
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 262773
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Comparative Law and Governance


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY