Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Maria Lund
dc.contributor.authorRiisgaard, Karen
dc.contributor.authorFrede, Thingstad
dc.contributor.authorSt. John, Mike
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Torkel Gissel
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-15T13:41:53Z
dc.date.available2016-01-15T13:41:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-23
dc.identifier.citationAquatic Microbial Ecology 2015, 76:49-69eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/10971
dc.description.abstractIn temperate, subpolar and polar marine systems, the classical perception is that diatoms initiate the spring bloom and thereby mark the beginning of the productive season. Contrary to this view, we document an active microbial food web dominated by pico- and nanoplankton prior to the diatom bloom, a period with excess nutrients and deep convection of the water column. During repeated visits to stations in the deep Iceland and Norwegian basins and the shallow Shetland Shelf (26 March to 29 April 2012), we investigated the succession and dynamics of photosynthetic and heterotrophic microorganisms. We observed that the early phytoplankton production was followed by a decrease in the carbon:nitrogen ratio of the dissolved organic matter in the deep mixed stations, an increase in heterotrophic prokaryote (bacteria) abundance and activity (indicated by the high nucleic acid:low nucleic acid bacteria ratio), and an increase in abundance and size of heterotrophic protists. The major chl a contribution in the early winter-spring transition was found in the fraction <10 µm, i.e. dominated by pico- and small nanophytoplankton. The relative abundance of picophytoplankton decreased towards the end of the cruise at all stations despite nutrient-replete conditions and increasing day length. This decrease is hypothesised to be the result of top-down control by the fast-growing population of heterotrophic protists. As a result, the subsequent succession and nutrient depletion can be left to larger phytoplankton resistant to small grazers. Further, we observed that large phytoplankton (chl a > 50 µm) were stimulated by deep mixing later in the period, while picophytoplankton were unaffected by mixing; both physical and biological reasons for this development are discussed herein.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherInter-Research Science Center (IR)eng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/17362" target="blank">Microbial dynamics in high latitude ecosystems. Responses to mixing, runoff and seasonal variation a rapidly changing environment</a>
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 3.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0eng
dc.subjectMicrobial food webeng
dc.subjectWinter−spring transitioneng
dc.subjectDeep mixingeng
dc.subjectPicophytoplanktoneng
dc.subjectNanophytoplanktoneng
dc.subjectBacteriaeng
dc.subjectHeterotrophic nanoflagellateseng
dc.subjectMicrozooplanktoneng
dc.subjectSubarctic Atlanticeng
dc.titleWinter−spring transition in the subarcticAtlantic: microbial response to deep mixingand pre-bloom productioneng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.date.updated2015-09-25T14:13:17Z
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2015 The Authorseng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.identifier.cristinID1275443
dc.identifier.doi10.3354/ame01767eng
dc.source.issn1616-1564eng
bora.bpoaIDbpoa493
noa.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400eng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY 3.0